Lawyers in Gaiam's home state of Colorado filed suit last week seeking class-action status for a lawsuit against Gaiam for BPA in their aluminum water bottles. ZRecs broke the story accusing Gaiam of hiding BPA in their water bottles, followed it up by breaking the story of Gaiam's admission of BPA at far greater levels than SIGG, and have continued to follow the story as Gaiam has released testing data and cleaned up their own website.

After Caddell & Chapman filed its lawsuit against SIGG in October (we also did most of the original reporting on that story), multiple firms' lawyers were racing to be first to bring Gaiam to court, and C&C got beat out. Perhaps as a result of this hasty process, there are a couple of errors in the filing by Chimicles & Tikellis LLP that will need correcting. I'm not sure how that process works, but we'll relay them here rather than contacting the lawyers directly, in order to make it clear that we have had and will continue to have no connection with this lawsuit.

1. The complaint cites Gaiam bottles as containing levels of BPA "ten times larger than the levels of BPA that SIGG reported in its own bottles." In fact, it is approximately ten times larger than the method detection limit used in SIGG's internal testing, which was 2 parts per billion. In those tests, however, SIGG did not show any detectable leaching (i.e. leaching occurred at levels below that testing threshold).


2. Multiple references are made to the bottles being made of stainless steel. They are in fact made of aluminum. Gaiam does also sell stainless steel water bottles, but these are highly unlikely to contain BPA, as stainless steel water bottles do not need to be lined, as aluminum does.

When lawyers come calling...

It's worth taking a moment to outline how we interact with lawyers when they come calling. We believe Gaiam should be held accountable for its deceptive marketing and its executives' refusal to come clean on an issue that was a high consumer priority until we proved beyond any reasonable doubt that they were hiding something. Class action lawsuits are, for better and for worse, the primary forum our government provides for seeing these issues resolved. But participating in that process isn't our role. It wasn't with Carter's, it wasn't with SIGG, and it won't be with Gaiam.

There's even a chance that you could be a loyal reader of Z Recommends and never have heard about the class action lawsuits moving forward against Carter's and SIGG, both of which were filed during the periods in which we aggressively covered the issue. That's because we make a rule of not publishing posts seeking to help firms who are looking for plaintiffs for their lawsuits, or to publish comments from lawyers doing the same. You see, owning an issue like this, which can be lucrative for a business litigation firm, typically centers around which team of lawyers can find a suitable individual or individuals to be named as plaintiffs and get to the courthouse first. There are so many potential conflicts of interest in our allowing them to conduct their search on Z Recommends - not to mention the spam-tinged unpleasantness for our regular readers - that we will never let it happen, even though it means rejecting comments from lawyers who may express a passion for seeing real justice done.

When lawyers contact us, we sometimes discuss information that was provided to us on the record for publication, or which we discovered in our own research. We do not share information that was provided to us off the record, we do not share information relevant to stories we are still developing, and we do not name sources who have requested to remain anonymous.

If you are aware of any other companies we should investigate for their marketing claims or product safety, get in touch with us. Our email address is editors (at) zrecs (dot) com.

Gaiam, again without public announcement, has made changes to its website to offer additional information about its BPA-containing aluminum bottles. The site's product pages for aluminum water bottles now include links to two tests - one for testing under "normal" conditions, and one under what the company has claimed are "extreme" conditions. Interestingly, the link to the "extreme" test results is currently broken, but you can find it here; here's a direct link to the "normal" test conditions, too.

The reports confirm what the company revealed last month after ZRecs accused the company of selling BPA-containing aluminum water bottles under the guise that they were BPA-free: That the bottles leach BPA at 23.8 parts per billion under standard BPA testing conditions, nearly 20 times that of BPA testing of SIGG bottles by a confidential source, and over 10 times that of the minimum detection level of 2 ppb in SIGG's internal testing of their own bottles, which turned up no BPA.

Additionally, product pages for Gaiam water bottles now have an added graphic at the top of the "Reviews" section of the page, reading: "100% Satisfaction Guarantee: If you are in any way dissatisfied with our product you ordered, we'll exchange it, replace it, or refund your money. Please call 1.877.6321 for details." Our assumption is that this policy is not new, but that it is simply being highlighted now to provide some recourse for frustrated consumers. The statement is repeated at the bottom of the review section.

Gaiam's reviews have been relatively quiet on the issue of BPA in the company's bottles. Gaiam requires reviewers to log into an account created with the company in order to post a review, and moderates reviews, and, according to its terms and conditions, "reserves the right to remove or to refuse to post any submission for any reason."


Gaiam has refused to provide information to ZRecs regarding any plans to phase out BPA in their water bottle linings. If you own a Gaiam bottle, we encourage you to contact them and request a stainless steel water bottle to replace your aluminum one.

A week after Z Recommends published an exclusive report that provided extensive evidence that Gaiam water bottles previously marketed as "BPA-free" were likely to contain the endocrine-disrupting chemical bisphenol-A, the company has quietly added information to its retail website which admits to independent lab test results showing leaching levels at 23.8 parts per billion. These findings are more than ten times the detection limit SIGG said revealed no leaching from their own bottles and over 18 times more than the leaching levels found in independent testing of SIGG bottles shared with ZRecs by an anonymous source.

SIGG's revelation of the use of BPA in their aluminum water bottles after years of obfuscation sent the company into a PR tailspin, despite their claims of no leaching, and their readiness with a new BPA-free alternative. In the case of Gaiam, the company itself has admitted to leaching at nearly twenty times that detected in SIGG bottles, in bottles currently being sold, after explicitly marketing them as BPA-free as recently as Spring 2009, claims Gaiam customer service representatives repeated to ZRecs less than a month ago.

Notes added to Gaiam's aluminum water bottle listings read, in part:

Single-use plastic water bottles and reusable plastic bottles made of certain types of hard polycarbonate plastic have been shown to leach toxins including BPA into the water inside the bottle under normal use and care conditions. ...

We also asked our water bottle manufacturer to comprehensively test our aluminum bottles for BPA, using industry-standard test methods. No detectable levels of BPA were found in the gasket, the cap or the coating material in testing under normal use and care conditions.

We also took additional steps to help ensure your safety via independent laboratory tests that go well beyond FDA requirements. An independent lab subjected our aluminum water bottles to continuous extreme heat - nearly 200 degrees Fahrenheit - in an environmental chamber for three days while the bottles were filled with water. Under these extreme conditions, a trace amount of BPA (23.8 parts per billion) was detected in the water inside the bottle. This test was performed under conditions outside the normal use and care conditions we recommend on our product packaging and shopping website. For example, we explain that the bottle should not be washed in a dishwasher or filled with any hot liquids.

(You can find the above statement, and a few other notes, added to listings like the one for the "Gold Medallion" water bottle design, the contents of which we documented with screen captures in our September 30 report.)

The third paragraph in the above excerpt, as well as the phrase "in testing under normal use and care conditions" peppered throughout, are the most significant additions to the text. As for the "extreme conditions" of Gaiam's testing, SIGG's independent lab testing also measured leaching in temperatures of "nearly 200 degrees" (90 degrees Celsius) over a three-day period, and this is no coincidence - testing at 90 degrees Celsius for a three-day window is a standard testing procedure commonly seen in BPA testing, and was likely part of a standard block of tests offered by the testing lab to Gaiam, as it is to other clients by reputable testing labs throughout the world, to provide a relative measure of potential BPA exposure. The relationship between these conditions and the occasional heat exposure any water bottle is likely to see - hand-washing in hot water, being left in a hot car or in the sun, or being dented or otherwise having its epoxy coating scratched or damaged - is unclear, as is Gaiam's position on whether these likely exposures fall under the proscribed "normal use and care" intended to protect the user from the endocrine-disrupting chemical Gaiam previously claimed was not present in its bottles.

Gaiam's admission - made without a press release, letter from the CEO, blog post, or tweet - should be of the greatest concern to pregnant women, many of whom assume Gaiam water bottles are a safe alternative to polycarbonate plastic during pregnancy. We don't often cite specific studies on the health effects from BPA exposure, as theories about specific health effects are still evolving. But the news that comes out in study after study is never good, and its greatest impact for adult users is likely to be in the fetal development of children whose lives may be permanently affected by in utero exposure. Here's some information from one recent study funded in part by the National Institutes of Health and conducted by the Yale University School of Medicine, as described in a report by Science Daily:

BPA has estrogen-like properties and in pregnant animals has been linked to female infertility.

"The big mystery is how does exposure to this estrogen-like substance during a brief period in pregnancy lead to a change in uterine function," said study co-author Hugh Taylor, MD, professor and chief of the reproductive endocrinology section at Yale University School of Medicine.

To find the answer to that question, Taylor and his co-workers at Yale injected pregnant mice with a low dose of BPA on pregnancy days 9 to 16. After the mice gave birth, the scientists analyzed the uterus of female offspring and extracted DNA.

They found that BPA exposure during pregnancy had a lasting effect on one of the genes that is responsible for uterine development and subsequent fertility in both mice and humans. Furthermore, these changes in the offspring's uterine DNA resulted in a permanent increase in estrogen sensitivity. ... The permanent DNA changes in the BPA-exposed offspring were not apparent in the offspring of mice that did not receive BPA injection (the controls). This finding demonstrates that the fetus is sensitive to BPA in mice and likely also in humans, Taylor said.

"We don't know what a safe level of BPA is, so pregnant women should avoid BPA exposure," Taylor said. "There is nothing to lose by avoiding items made with BPA—and maybe a lot to gain."

Why their admission of BPA leaching in bottles they claimed less than a year ago were "BPA-free" merits only a rewrite of their product descriptions and a mildly cautionary "comparison chart" [Update: They have now produced a standalone page compiling this information] is a question we'll leave to consumers and eager class-action lawyers to probe for themselves. But we have a few of our own, which we'll submit to Gaiam's public relations team and publish with a call for a company statement on Gaiam's plans.

Gaiam refused to cooperate with us for our initial story, and has to date declined to issue any public statement about our claims of BPA in their aluminum water bottles, or the company's previous marketing of these bottles as BPA-free.

Updated to add: Another oddity brought up to us by readers and competitors is that Gaiam's "comparison chart" has broadly classified aluminum water bottles as leaching BPA. It is now well-known that SIGG now produces an aluminum water bottle that appears to be BPA-free, and ZRecs has examined testing reports and materials certifications of bottles by LakenUSA that show that that company's own transition to a BPA-free liner for bottles its parent company produces for the U.S. market is complete. We've written about our disappointment with SIGG's new bottle, based both on the high number of bottles sent to market with the liner misapplied and, in our sister site The Tranquil Parent's BPA-Free Water Bottle Showdown, the functionality of their redesigned sport top. We'll discuss the case of LakenUSA, a company that made the transition to BPA-free bottles alongside SIGG but traveled a quite different path to get there, next week.

Updated to add: Gaiam has published some test results and is putting a greater emphasis on consumers' right to return products. Read about it here.

Like what we do? Share it on your favorite social sharing website using the links below, or email it to a friend!

Editor's Note: Don't miss our breaking news regarding Gaiam’s BPA admission after reading this post.

Gaiam may be best known among the public at large as a retailer of all things yoga in an age that can't get enough of low-impact, vaguely spiritual forms of exercise. But being the U.S.'s largest creator and distributor of fitness and yoga DVDs (Gaiam owns more than half of the U.S. market, has over 7,000 store-within-a-store displays at major retailers nationwide, and distributes tens of milions of direct-mail catalogs a year) and one of the country's top retailers of reusable aluminum water bottles (one industry source ZRecs spoke with considered them the second or third biggest player in the metal water bottle market, depending on whether you consider the now-shamed SIGG to be down for the count) - that's just the beginning.

Gaiam's gift has always been selling products using original (and often high-quality) content, and in the last decade Gaiam has become as much of a media empire as a retail giant. The company is a prolific pillar of the LOHAS community ("lifestyles of health and sustainability," a term Gaiam's founder coined in the 1990s to better describe their customer than the not-quite-right "cultural creatives,"), thanks in part to acquisitions of the Lime.com content site (ranked among the top 35,000 websites worldwide by Alexa.com), Gaiam's absorption of Whole Foods' ailing WholePeople.com site in exchange for a minority stake in the content-rich direct retail portal Gaiam.com (yep, Whole Foods owns 49.9% of Gaiam.com), and Gaiam also purchased the biggest LOHAS community site online (Gaia.com, which boasts nearly 300,000 members and contributes to Gaiam.com's ranking in the top 3,000 websites, according to Alexa).

In other words, if you have a sustainable bone in your body (and for your sake, I certainly hope that you do!) you probably interact with someone who is drawing their paycheck from Gaiam.

So here's where I spell it out. Millions of U.S. consumers were shocked and dismayed to discover that SIGG aluminum water bottles contained "trace amounts" of bisphenol-A, particularly because they had purchased those bottles thinking they were making a healthy and environmentally responsible choice. BPA is bad for people and it is bad for marine life, at a minimum. If that's why people bought SIGG bottles, I'm going to guess that it's also why people bought Gaiam's aluminum water bottles.

My goal in this post is to lay out evidence that makes it crystal clear that Gaiam is doing exactly what SIGG did prior to their announcement that their water bottles contained BPA. Whether Gaiam is working on a solution to this problem, as SIGG reportedly spent two years doing and then another year rolling out while consumers continued to buy their BPA-containing bottles under questionable assumptions - well, that's anyone's guess, at least for now. But I suspect that a lot of people, like me, expected more from a company that has claimed the title of cultural visionary on health and on personal, if not corporate, transparency.

First, I'll show why we believe Gaiam is not telling you the whole story about their aluminum water bottles and the endocrine-disrupting, yogi-hating chemical we like to call "the big B." I'll source and provide links throughout. Then I'll tell you why this situation bothers us as much as, if not more than, the hard truths we learned about SIGG.

Gaiam marketed their aluminum water bottles as BPA-free six months ago. Why'd they stop?

This is a scan from Gaiam's printed Spring 2009 catalog showing the description of Gaiam's aluminum water bottles.

Our BPA-free aluminum water bottle keeps your water clear and fresh, while keeping disposable water bottles out of landfills. Generous, 20-oz. size with ring-top screw cap (Grass features sports top). Choose from six new designs. 9 3/4" H x 2 3/4" diameter. China.

Here's a link to a PDF we uploaded of the catalog cover and interior page.

Here's a scan from the printed Fall 2009 catalog. Note the change:

Now in even fresher designs and colors, our exclusive aluminum bottles keep your water clear and fresh, while keeping disposable water bottles out of landfills. Generous, lightweight bottle with ring-top screw cap (Grass features sports top) is 100% recyclable. 750 ml. 9 3/4" H x 2 3/4" diameter. Hand wash. China.

Here's a link to that one.

The product page for Gaiam's aluminum water bottle with "Rocky Mountain" graphics, as viewed on Friday, Sept. 25, 2009, appeared identical to that of every other aluminum water bottle Gaiam sells. Here's a direct link to the page.

From the "Product Description" tab: "Reusable, leak-proof aluminum bottles keep your water free from harmful plastic residues."

From the "Product Story" section:

Why Aluminum?
- 86% of plastic water bottles used in the United States end up in landfills, taking up to 1,000 years to biodegrade.
- Transporting bottled water consumes approximately 1.5 million barrels of fossil fuels per year. Help reduce this number by carrying a refillable bottle.
- Americans are currently adding 30 million PET water bottles to our landfills every day.
- When you use an aluminum bottle, your water remains free of unhealthy plastic residues.
Sources: American Recycling Institute and Natural Resources Defense Council.

And, a little further down:

Gaiam bottles are coated with a thin, food-grade epoxy resin that meets the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) 175.300 requirements for toxic elements in foodware. FDA requirements call for testing that meets EPA guidelines. Our manufacturer comprehensively tested the bottle lining, cap and gasket for Bisphenol-A (BPA) using the EPA 3550C method and no detectable levels of BPA were found in the gasket, the cap or the coating material.

Sound familiar?

We don't have screen captures of life before the word "BPA" was banned from Gaiam's aluminum water bottle product descriptions, but we do have something almost as good. Scrubbing a website is hard. Look at these cached (and still live) search results, which link to Gaiam product pages.


Here's a detail shot from those results.



If there is still any doubt in your mind as to whether Gaiam has secretly developed a BPA-free coating for its aluminum water bottles and is just too humble to take credit for it, take a look at the product information they provide for their stainless steel water bottles:


It seems pretty clear to us what Gaiam is up to here. What's more frustrating is that like SIGG, Gaiam has not been shy about profiting from consumers' flight from polycarbonate plastic. Although Gaiam hasn't formally admitted - yet - to their "epoxy resin" lining containing BPA, and could thus be argued to be in a slightly better strategic position than SIGG was after CEO Steve Wasik came clean, we have the clear record of recent claims of their bottles' BPA-free status, which no one turned up in SIGG's case (and SIGG maintains isn't there to be found).

But there are three things about Gaiam's current situation that feel particularly - well, unenlightened.

1. Gaiam's bloggers are not connecting the dots

Numerous Gaiam-funded bloggers have discussed the issue of BPA in water bottles. On the official Gaiam site Gaiam Life, blogger Janet Forgrieve's article "What Type of Reusable Water Bottle Is Best?" appears alongside a "Related Products" column that showcases three Gaiam aluminum water bottles. She writes:

Researchers at the National Institutes of Health are conducting ongoing studies into the effects of the chemical but did release preliminary data last year showing that neonatal exposure to low levels of BPA in rats caused cancerous growths.

Manufacturers and retailers that sell plastic bottles in the United States reacted by switching over to BPA-free polycarbonate bottles.

Should you switch to a metal water bottle?
You can avoid plastics altogether with a reusable stainless steel or aluminum water bottle. Unlike BPA-free plastics, they’re not made from petroleum products. Metal water bottles are more durable than plastic, and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration requires that aluminum bottles sold in America be lined to eliminate the possibility of metals leaching into the drinking water inside.

She went on to conclude that "To do right by both your health and your planet, grab a BPA-free reusable water bottle made of the most eco-friendly material you can find." In our view, the circle of inference was complete.

In a republished "EarthTalk" column - "Are plastic water bottles a health hazard?" - also published on Gaiam Life, the anonymous authors were more direct:

Studies have indicated that food and drinks stored in such containers - including those ubiquitous clear Nalgene water bottles hanging from just about every hiker's backpack - can contain trace amount of Bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic chemical that interferes with the body’s natural hormonal messaging system. ... According to the Environment California Research & Policy Center, which reviewed 130 studies on the topic, BPA has been linked to breast and uterine cancer, an increased risk of miscarriage, and decreased testosterone levels. BPA can also wreak havoc on children’s developing systems. (Parents beware: Most baby bottles and sippy cups are made with plastics containing BPA.)

Most experts agree that the amount of BPA that could leach into food and drinks through normal handling is probably very small, but there are concerns about the cumulative effect of small doses.

Safer choices include bottles crafted from safer HDPE (plastic #2), low-density polyethylene (LDPE, AKA plastic #4) or polypropylene (PP, or plastic #5). Consumers may have a hard time finding water bottles made out of #4 or #5, however. Aluminum and stainless steel water bottles are also safe choices and can be reused repeatedly and eventually recycled.

(The link, of course, takes BPA-concerned readers to Gaiam's online store.)

Either of these examples are hard to fault their authors for - although both are undated, it's likely they were written months before our collective post-SIGG hangover.

Things are not so rosy on Lime. Belinda Miller's "SIGG, How Could You?" is a case where it's hard to imagine publishing a piece under that masthead - it says it right there, "A GAIAM COMPANY" - without doing a little pondering.

I wrote about Sigg back in 2006 and was specifically impressed that they did not leach toxic residue into liquids. I trusted their claims about their "proprietary water-based resin"... baked onto the aluminum bottle. Exceeding FDA standards, Sigg asserts that the "liner is safe, petroleum-products free, and will not leach aluminum or any synthetic residue." Now I see that they did not specifically say they didn’t contain BPAs, but they certainly committed a sin of omission given that parents all over were freaking out about BPA and they positioned themselves as a safe option. I was new to my Momster mission, and more trusting that companies wouldn’t lie just to sell product. And we’ve used our Sigg bottles continuously since, blissfully ignorant. ... So now Sigg says that yes, bottles made before 2008 did contain BPA, but they still didn’t leach BPA. But their new liners are BPA-free. So, I feel kinda OK that they don’t leach harmful chemicals, but really mad that Sigg led us to believe that their bottles were BPA-free. And can I trust them now? It’s a frustrating world if you’re asking questions and trying to be aware.

Indeed.

2. Gaiam's customer service department is still stating, if pressed, that their bottles are BPA-free

We documented three calls to Gaiam's customer service over the course of three days. Our statements below are paraphrased, because we weren't writing those down. The customer service reps' statements are direct quotes.

Our first call reached Tiffany, a customer service representative who was very friendly and helpful. I asked her whether Gaiam bottles contained BPA, because SIGG had had some problems with that. "Really?" she said. "Yes," I said. "And I was calling to find out if Gaiam aluminum water bottles use BPA, too."

"Gaiam bottles are BPA-free."

"Really?" I asked. "What does that mean, exactly?"

Tiffany laughed. "It means they are not made with BPA."

Our second call hit their after-hours call center, some third party they outsource to. I didn't ask the customer service representative's name.

"Do Gaiam aluminum water bottles contain BPA?" I asked him.

"Just a minute," he said. He put me on hold and came back a minute or so later and said, "Gaiam bottles are coated with a thin, food-grade epoxy resin that meets the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) 175.300 requirements for toxic elements in foodware. FDA requirements call for testing that meets EPA guidelines. Our manufacturer comprehensively tested the bottle lining, cap and gasket for Bisphenol-A (BPA) using the EPA 3550C method and no detectable levels of BPA were found in the gasket, the cap or the coating material."

Me: "Yes, I saw that on the website. I don't really understand what that means."

CSR: "It means that the liner itself has been tested by the FDA and has been tested for BPA."

Me: "But that doesn't tell me if there was BPA used to make it. Is there BPA in the lining?"

CSR: "It's not in it, basically. There's no BPA in them at all."

We tried another call with the day shift, with Jenni placing the call this time in case we got Tiffany again. We didn't. We got Pam. In our exchange with Pam, she used all of the following phrases: "Food-grade epoxy," "resin polymer," and "What is BPA?" Again, when pressed, we got the information we seemed to be looking for. "It does not have it," she said.

3. Gaiam won't tell us the sensitivity of their BPA testing, let alone answer the question "Do they contain BPA?"

We contacted Gaiam through multiple channels in an attempt to get testing data that would show us the sensitivity of BPA testing they did on their aluminum bottles, despite the fact that SIGG's example has proven that this is a poor substitute for transparency regarding the materials used in the production of the product, information every company has ready access to.

We contacted Gaiam's internal marketing department. We called CEO Lynn Powers' office directly. We passed messages to Gaiam through multiple levels of their PR agency. We asked for excerpted details from their testing data, for any information that might contradict our assessment of the situation, and finally for a simple public statement about the issue we were about to raise in this post. We outlined the evidence we had accumulated and told them they could respond proactively, or reactively.

Gaiam, one of the world's most proactive companies since its founding in the mid-1970s, has chosen to react.

The customers are coming

As we prepared this article for publication, we went through the reviews and customer questions in every aluminum water bottle listing on Gaiam.com, wondering if we'd turn up any interesting statements from Gaiam officials. What we found, instead, was a silence that is revealing a company that practically owns the term "Conscious Consumerism" as distant, opaque, and out-of-touch.

This is what is beautiful about the Internet - unanswered questions [link|screenshot], the volumes spoken by silence, and consumers' ultimate refusal, however long in coming, to accept the mantra "Trust us" as any way to live. (Follow the link above if you'd like to ask second one industrious customer's unanswered question.)

Here's a slideshow of screen captures from many of the pages discussed in this article:



Like what you read on Z Recommends? You can have posts delivered for free every day via RSS or email, or follow our family safety Twitter feed, ZRecs_Safety. If you're already a subscriber, please click through to this post if you like it - traffic to this post lets us know you'd like to see more content like this.

Editor's Note: Don't miss our breaking news regarding Gaiam’s BPA admission after reading this post.

Welcome to another edition of You Bought It, where we take a peek at interesting stuff ZRecs readers are buying through our Amazon links. As mentioned previously, we (and every Amazon affiliate) get lists of products sold through our links on Amazon.com - in our case, these purchases fund much of the consumer research and consumer advocacy we do. (ZRecs gets a small commission from Amazon for sales of anything you purchase on a visit to Amazon which originates from our site or one of our customized Amazon URLs - not just the item we linked to, but anything purchased in that shopping trip.)

Last month we thought it would be fun to share some of the interesting things we see purchased this way with our readers, since we count some of the savviest parent shoppers among our readership. And guess what? It is! The response to You Bought It #1 has far surpassed even our optimistic assumptions, so we couldn't wait to do this again. So between our original research and reporting on SIGG, Carter's, nanoparticles, and checking out products at Las Vegas' ABC Kids Expo, we have been keeping an eye on the purchases being made by ZRecs readers through our Amazon links. Here are some interesting trends and purchases we've noticed, with plenty of tips, video demos, and recommendations sprinkled in.

This edition covers reader purchases from August 13 through September 26, 2009.

You Bought Stuff to Eat and Drink With

In the inaugural You Bought It we offered a pretty detailed breakdown of sippy cup sales that came on the heels of our head-to-head reviews of sippy and straw cups for infants up through late preschool. We saw a lot of purchases of adult water bottles this month, due no doubt to the SIGG BPA mess and the series of recommendations, ZRecs Guide updates, and Water Bottle Showdown that followed on ZRecs blogs. I don't have time to crunch the numbers to the same level of detail, but can say that Camelbak kids' and adult stainless steel bottles were purchased in the greatest quantities, followed by Thinksport insulated stainless steel water bottles.

Which reminds me of something we've been meaning to post about Camelbak. We recently praised the advances the company made to their bite valve flip-top lid's design after using their stainless steel kids' bottle, but even in praising it we didn't realize it has a button to release the flip top! Check it out:


Thinksport is poised to add a couple of shiny metallic colors to their lineup, but asked us not to publish photos of the samples they had on hand at the recent ABC Kids' Expo trade show, because the colors there weren't a perfect match. But you can look for blue and purple being added to the Thinksport lineup soon.

A few readers purchased Trebimbi Click utensils, which we reviewed (and were politely asked to defend) last year, and Lunchbots stainless steel food storage containers. We really liked their Uno single-compartment container, but were less thrilled by the divided Duo, but it was only through our browsing of readers' Amazon shopping that we discovered their Pico (a smaller version of the Duo) and Eco (a deeper version of the Uno), which are great products for Lunchbots to add to their mix. We've added both to the ZRecs Guide, along with a lot of other stuff this past month.

Readers also bought a lot of Kinderville Little Bites silicone kids' food storage jars, bowls, and cups, which we loved, really liked, and weren't so thrilled about, respectively. The relative numbers were consistent with our own assessments. In other words, a lot of people bought the storage jars, a good number bought the bowls, and fewer bought the cups. (And yes, they were high enough to be statistically significant!) We'd be really interested to know if anyone bought all three, because our stats from Amazon don't offer any info regarding items purchased together. If you bought some Kinderville dishes, let us know what you think of them now that you've had a chance to live with them a bit. Any down sides to silicone we didn't consider?

We also saw several sales of a few water bottles we haven't written about, and even a couple we didn't yet have in the ZRecs Guide - KOR Tritan water bottles (which I might be able to wrap my head around if it didn't look like the front of my old Mac G4 and cost $30) and cheap Aquasansa glass water bottles, to name a couple. We have the KOR in the Guide and will add the Aquasansa bottles if and when we can check some materials information with the company.

You Bought Books

Our readers make some fantastic book selections, both on parenting topics and in books for kids. Here are a few:

• A Hole Is To Dig by Ruth Krauss and Maurice Sendak: We adore this book. It's one of the better "weird twists on defining objects from a child's perspective" books, which is one of the things Ruth Krauss, like Margaret Wise Brown, loved to do.


• Nurture Shock: New Thinking About Children by Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman: Recommended to us by Adrienne, which is about all the recommendation we need. Still, no time.


• Raising Our Children, Raising Ourselves: Transforming parent-child relationships from reaction and struggle to freedom, power, and joy by Naomi Aldort: This is one of the better parenting books we have actually, um, read. It's really very good. It deals with the parent-child relationship as a journey together in which both have a lot to learn - in other words, we not only don't "have to" be perfect as parents, but by treating our children as our emotional equals whose feelings deserve the same respect and exploration as our own, we get to learn from them as much as they learn from us.


• Toxic Beauty: How Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Endanger Your Health... And What You Can Do About It: Whoever bought this should send us a report!


• Einstein Never Used Flash Cards: How Our Children Really Learn - And Why They Need To Play More and Memorize Less: Explores the "Einsteining" of the American baby, and why it's a bad thing. In short: Don't push your young child to be "high achievers" in areas you perceive to be "adult" (writing, reading, etc.). Remember that play is the work of childhood!

You Bought Toys and An Awesome Bike

We were excited to discover wooden toy brand Woody Click, whose Farm In A Box runs $100 but looks like a pretty dense package of small, high-quality stuff. It's an unusual format and we'll see what we can get our hands on from the company to test out.

We really, really wish the themed versions of Kettler's Balance Bike, like the Kettler Sprint Balance Bike one reader bought this month, were around when we bought one for Z. Back then there was only the primary colored one, and she would have flipped for this version. They also have a cool chopper-themed one.

Last but not least, someone bought our new favorite Plan toy - the Miracle Ball Pounder. No, this is NOT the Plan Toy we highlighted last month (and, in fact, we have deliberately avoided mentioning purchases of toys in this post that were highlighted in You Bought It #1, of which there were many, because that would lead to a rift in the space-time continuum which, if not corrected through the use of a Delorian and a Hoverboard, would ultimately lead to the destruction of the known universe). You can see it in a compilation of Plan toddler toys we played with recently at a trade show - they're all really, really nice, and the Miracle Ball Pounder is second in this demo. Luckily for me, Jenni discovered the hammer:


We love the pounders, but the musical toys shown in that video are among the best wooden musical toys for preschoolers we've seen, and all are on sale on Amazon: the Plan Toys Oval Xylophone, their Solid Wood Drum, and the Toy Percussion Set.

You Bought Other Stuff

This past month or so also saw sales of several CARES flight restraint systems. We have highly recommended the FAA-approved CARES system for air travel with young children, and have noticed that in the time since we first started using it, we have basically stopped getting questions from flight attendants checking to make sure they're legit for takeoff and landing. My guess is that they're seeing more and more of them. ZRecs' readers purchases of CARES restraints during holiday travel periods - and the fact that CARES' manufacturer, Kids Fly Safe, appears to be doing well even during rough economic times - certainly support that theory.

This Will Return clock made us laugh. And someone picked up a Mutsy Spider Stroller for $250. We think you got a good deal - it's a great stroller, as we wrote in our Mutsy Spider review, and it has been discontinued. But if anyone else is still in the market, use this link - they're $180 through a third-party seller on Amazon compared with the $250 Amazon is charging direct. And there's free shipping either way.

If You Bought It: What Did You Think Of It?

One of the things we love most about publishing ZRecs is getting your reviews and observations on products in post comments. If you own any of the products above, tell us what you think of them! We're compiling interesting comments for posts about user experiences with specific products, and may quote readers in ZRecs Guide listings in the future. Review the post above and, if you have any experience with any of the products we've discussed, let us know what you think of them! (If you're reading this post in your email or an RSS reader, click here to visit the post and comment.)

Like what you read on Z Recommends? You can have posts delivered for free every day via RSS or email, as well as occasional summaries of our links to other blogs, news articles, and websites from our Delicious feed (our alternative to published link roundups). If you're already a subscriber, please click through to this post if you like it - traffic to this post lets us know you'd like to see more content like this.

One challenge in publishing a consumer research blog is that we sometimes get information off the record. We regularly point readers to the ZRecs Guide because it allows us to assign "confidence" ratings, which we often cite as allowing us to consider a company's track record when evaluating statements they make. What we don't usually like to spell out is that we also base our confidence ratings, at times, on information we have acquired but cannot publish.

BPA researcher Frederick vom Saal's statements in an article in The Star today have given us the opportunity to let something come out that we weren't previously at liberty to share. Vom Saal stated that he tested SIGG bottles several years ago and found leaching in the parts per trillion range. Based on an agreement we have made with a party that provided us with testing data off the record during our investigation of SIGG last month, we are now able to share some information that we believe independently supports Vom Saal's claim.

Two out of two labs agree: SIGGs leached BPA

Two weeks ago, we were provided with BPA leach testing results for a SIGG water bottle purchased in July, that had SIGG's older, BPA-containing liner. The test was conducted in a 3% acetic acid solution at 40 degrees Celsius, with a stated limit on quantitation (minimum detection level) of .5 parts per billion, or 500 parts per trillion. The bottle was found to leach BPA at 1.25 micrograms per liter, which is roughly equivalent to 1.25 parts per billion. In relative terms, this is more than what Vom Saal states he had found, although he has not yet provided many details of his tests. In absolute terms, both values are very, very small. Everyone - you included - is exposed to BPA at higher levels from other sources, many of them entirely outside of your control. Canned foods tested by the Environmental Working Group contained up to 385 ppb, and even if you avoid those, there are plenty of others. Labs testing water bottles for BPA have to correct for background BPA in the water - sometimes up to 2 ppb. (We have confirmed, for the record, that this test made such a correction as a matter of standard procedure.)

As for SIGG's specific situation, we aren't sure this is particularly damning. They tested to 2 ppb - a level that others in the industry, including company heads we know to be aggressive in their own testing and have no love lost with SIGG, told us was a reasonable threshold for commercial testing of a product. Spinning this into "0.0% leaching," as SIGG often did, is another story.

How can we get more information on the record?

Most of the information we accept off the record is product testing data we would never get otherwise. We scrutinize it carefully, and if it checks out, we may negotiate with the provider of the information to see if there is some way we can use the information that protects their anonymity. In this case, there was no agreement that worked for both sides until Vom Saal went public with his own testing, at which point our source agreed to let us share the findings and the methodology of the testing they had performed, although we agreed to continue to protect the name of the lab and the source of the information.

Accepting information off the record is never ideal, but it allows us access to a lot of information we can use indirectly to provide guidance to consumers through our listings in the ZRecs Guide. We encourage you to pay attention to product listings that are not flagged for a chemical but have "low" confidence assigned to that status, as well as products you might have believed were free of BPA or some other chemical but are flagged as containing it. Most of these are based on our knowledge of a company's track record of trustworthiness, but some are based on information we have acquired but are not in a position to share.

There is another way to get around off-the-record testing: Testing products ourselves based on good leads. The problem is that that costs money. We considered testing an older SIGG bottle for BPA so we could get a clean lab result we could share openly, but it would have cost about $350 that we do not have.

But we have been thinking about a different way of doing testing to find out things that our community of readers want to know. What if ZRecs readers were willing to contribute small amounts to a fund that would test a product we believe, for reasons we cannot disclose, is highly likely to contain a harmful substance its manufacturer believes claims it is free of? What if ZRecs as a community engaged in grassroots product testing?

We'll be making an offer to ZRecs readers to do just that very soon.

More on this story

• SIGG's BPA Confession


• Two warnings before you request a replacement SIGG bottle


• The ZRecs 2009 BPA-Free Water Bottle Showdown


• ZRecs evidence of misleading statements by SIGG representatives


• our interview with SIGG CEO Steve Wasik