Jump to: ZRecs Home | Z Recommends | PRIZEY | The Tranquil Parent | Punnybop | The ZRecs Guide to Safer Children's Products
Subscribe via RSS Get Z Recommends posts and links delivered free via RSS or email

  • As seen in

    Subscribe to posts


    Get our newsletter





The FTC speaks up on “bamboo” textiles

The FTC speaks up on “bamboo” textiles
Photo by annieo76, shared via Flickr.
Many products marketed as being made from bamboo are actually just rayon, says the FTC - and this has a significant impact on a fiber's green cred and antibacterial properties.

This interesting public statement from the Federal Trade Commission discusses how a fabric being made from bamboo and being a bamboo fiber are not the same thing, and how bamboo can actually be used in ways that are harmful to the environment and lack any of the merits of true bamboo fiber.

So now we're wondering about the avalanche of baby blankets and clothing marketed as bamboo over the last few years. From the FTC:

Marketers looking to provide more environmentally friendly choices to consumers may have heard about bamboo, which has been recognized for its ability to grow quickly with little or no need for pesticides. But when it comes to textile products made from bamboo, that’s not the whole story.

The truth is, most “bamboo” textile products, if not all, really are rayon, which typically is made using environmentally toxic chemicals in a process that emits hazardous pollutants into the air. While different plants, including bamboo, can be used as a source material to create rayon, there’s no trace of the original plant in the finished rayon product.

If you make, advertise or sell bamboo-based textiles, the Federal Trade Commission, the nation’s consumer protection agency, wants you to know that unless a product is made directly with bamboo fiber - often called “mechanically processed bamboo” - it can’t be called bamboo. Indeed, to advertise or label a product as “bamboo,” you need competent and reliable evidence, such as scientific tests and analyses, to show that it’s made of actual bamboo fiber. Relying on other people’s claims isn’t substantiation. The same standard applies to other claims, like a claim that rayon fibers retain natural antimicrobial properties from the bamboo plant.

If you sell clothing, linens, or other textile products, you’re responsible for making truthful disclosures about the fiber content. If your product isn’t made directly of bamboo fiber - but is a manufactured fiber for which bamboo was the plant source - it should be labeled and advertised using the proper generic name for the fiber, such as rayon, or “rayon made from bamboo.”

Any claims you make about your textile products have to be true and cannot be misleading. As the seller, you must have substantiation for each and every claim - express and implied - that you make. [Link]


Can anyone in the industry comment on their company's practices for verifying fabrics and meeting the requirements below? This is an open opportunity to plug your brand's products if you can tell us how you have established "competent and reliable evidence" that your products meet the requirements to be called "bamboo." Please chime in if your company has experience with this issue and help educate us!
Share this post: Delicious | Digg | Facebook | Reddit | Stumble | Email
Categories: apparel and accessories, baby blankets, clothing
1. Condo Blues [9/08/09]

Does the same hold true for bamboo melamine? I saw a set of melamine dishes in a store that said they were “safe” because they were made from bamboo melamine, which looked like regular melamine to me and had the same do not microwave or put in the dishwasher warning as regular melamine.

2. Doug [9/09/09]

For those that have not done the research...it is certainly understandable that one may assume that the FTC is simply revealing “greenwashing” practices perpetrated by companies selling bamboo textiles. If you are truly interested in learning about the facts of this FTC alert, then I would encourage you to take a few moments and hear the other side of the story.

Yes, the FTC is supposed to be out protecting consumers from false advertising, monopolies etc., but you might be surprised to learn that there are truly some instances where the FTC’s just plain gets it wrong. To get the other side of the story, and see some examples of the FTC’s past wrongdoings, please take a look at this blog post: FTC Bamboozles Public on Bamboo Fabric

3. Jeremiah [9/10/09]

Doug, I thought we were pretty clear that we were seeking to be educated. I’m also guessing from your statements that you are not very familiar with our blog. We don’t tend to assume around here that government organizations are always acting in our best interests or providing us with the best information.

As for your link, it was at once extensive and incomplete. Your point about classification of new fabrics is well-taken, but it isn’t clear to me you’ve done any significant damage to the FTC’s claims here.

We’ll continue to watch what the FTC and businesses do to see how this issue develops. And as always, we welcome any and all information and discussions on the topic.

Condo Blues, great question! We’ll look into it.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Browse Z Recommends
Looking for something?
The ZRecs Guide
    1360 products, 261 brands, and counting...


Get ZRecs’ monthly newsletter
More good stuff





Advertisements
Advertisements