Jump to: ZRecs Home | Z Recommends | PRIZEY | The Tranquil Parent | Punnybop | The ZRecs Guide to Safer Children's Products
Subscribe via RSS Get Z Recommends posts and links delivered free via RSS or email

  • As seen in

    Subscribe to posts


    Get our newsletter






The shell game over BPA


Let me get this straight:

  • Research scientists follow basic policies and procedures to ensure their research is reputable. Their findings are reviewed by peers who aggressively seek out flaws of methodology to vet their findings for anything that might compromise their validity. Findings must be reproducible.

  • Industry research studies are almost always intrinsically biased, spurred as they are by the desire to prove efficacy or safety in order to market products. To make industry-sponsored research as useful and reputable as humanly possible, excruciating oversight is applied to their practices. Voluminous documentation must be generated and provided with findings. The FDA calls these "Good Laboratory Practices," but they are only applied to industry studies - not, for example, to studies funded by the National Institutes of Health. The strict procedures that must be followed to be in compliance would be overkill for standard labs, not to mention so costly and time-consuming they wouldn't get much research done. Thankfully, industry is in the best position to afford the level of oversight their own motivations require. (And make no mistake, much laughable industry research is generated, and aggressively marketed, despite these requirements.)

  • Hundreds of studies in highly-respected, peer-review scientific journals have shown BPA to be harmful to a level that alarms many public health researchers and scientists. Effects found in individual studies have been replicated in dozens of others. A panel convened by the NIH, made up of top scientistis in the field, concluded that there is "some concern" about the effect of BPA on fetuses and infants, based on voluminous research, and called for much more.

  • The FDA's repeated claim that BPA is safe for consumption by pregnant women and infants is based on a handful of industry studies. The hundreds of studies suggesting BPA is dangerous were not considered in their decision because they do not use Good Laboratory Practices - those standards applied strictly to industry research.


The FDA has managed to raise the charge of being beholden to industry to a new level. Now it's a sign of their commitment to science that they disregard 98% of the relevant scientific community.

Scientists plan to take them on at an open meeting tomorrow.
Categories: BPA
Share this post: Delicious | Digg | Facebook | Google Bookmarks | Reddit | Stumble | Email
1 Comments
1. Laura [9/17/08]

FYI

Study links Bisphenol A to heart disease, diabetes

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080916/bpa_study_080916/20080916?hub=Health

Comment on this post

All comments are reviewed before being posted, and all spam comments are rejected. Any links published in comments are flagged as "no-follow" links, meaning they will not help anyone's search engine rankings.


not displayed, never shared
Accepted HTML <a href>, <b>, <i>

Help for Haiti: Learn What You Can Do




Browse Z Recommends
Looking for something?
The ZRecs Guide
    1316 products, 250 brands, and counting...


Get ZRecs’ monthly newsletter
More good stuff



Advertisements
Advertisements

Chronicle Books 30% Halloween Skyscraper