Jump to: ZRecs Home | Z Recommends | PRIZEY | The Tranquil Parent | Punnybop | The ZRecs Guide to Safer Children's Products
Subscribe via RSS Get Z Recommends posts and links delivered free via RSS or email

  • As seen in

    Subscribe to posts


    Get our newsletter





ZRecs joins Safer Cans

ZRecs has formally partnered with Safer Cans, a campaign to get BPA out of metal food packaging like soft drinks and food containers. The impact of BPA from food packaging is profound, particularly in comparison with some products consumers are extremely sensitized to - we have mentioned in past reporting on SIGG, for example, that levels of leaching from their bottles are far less than that found in canned food, which can contain up to 350 times the amount of BPA at the point of consumption, thanks to the near-universal coating of cans with a BPA-containing epoxy lining.

One company, Eden Foods, uses a non-epoxy-based coating for their canned beans. Many cite this as a sign of progress in the industry, and it is certainly a bright spot. But it's the exceptionalism of this case that tells the real story. The can lining is applied to Ball cans for Eden by the Ball Corporation, their can supplier, but the cans are available to any food company that wanted to buy them from Ball (Eden pays about 14 cents extra per can) and the material used to coat the cans is available to any canning company that wanted to line a can with it - the material has been around for decades.

Eden Foods is a small company. But they're using BPA-free packaging when they can, pushing for a BPA-free alternative for their higher-acid products, and setting a transparent and progressive example that no other company has yet been willing to follow.

The real question is, why are they alone in taking the simple steps that are available, and why are they the only voice openly calling for new materials?

The North American Metal Packaging Alliance has taken a hard-line stance against BPA reform, and made a name for itself with some unfortunate backroom planning. Their goal is to ensure that metal packaging companies "stay on the same page" as far as their interests are concerned, on the theory that a threat to one is a threat to all.

Until the Environmental Working Group got a timeline-free commitment from Coke to work on developing alternatives to BPA linings in its soft drink cans, the issue of BPA in metal packaging appeared to be deadlocked. But in an economy with relatively free markets, nothing stands still. I'm not sure if there are many consumers who would switch from drinking their soft drink of choice to another brand in order to get a BPA-free can. (Who knows? Maybe there are.) But I bet many consumers would switch from one brand of beans, or soup, or tomatoes, to try an alternative that was actively advertised as BPA-free. There is competitive advantage to be gained in safer products, and sooner or later, someone is going to seek it out. Any major baby bottle company executive could tell you that - and wince over the market share they abandoned to new competition by their unwillingness to acknowledge the public's concerns about BPA.

We've had extensive discussions with organizers of the Safer Cans campaign and believe there's a useful role for us to play in information-gathering as well as reporting and consumer advocacy; based on the temperature of the water we'll be dipping into here, we'll be working far more on the former channel than the latter, conducting discussions with food company executives, industry analysts, environmental and consumer groups, and joining many others who are working to broker conversations that may not be happening as quickly or as frankly as they could be.

We will be reporting on progress only on an occasional basis, and generally deferring to the wishes of those who might prefer that some of these dealings not occur directly in the public eye. There's a reason peace talks don't offer media passes, and on this issue we're going to operate as changemakers first and journalists second. This means that although we'll enthusiastically bring readers news as we're able, our role in this issue will be a little different than the way we typically report on consumer safety issues.

You can support Safer Cans by displaying their badge on your own site, becoming a fan on Facebook, or following the campaign on Twitter.

If you work in the plastics industry, the metal packaging industry, or in any other company that has an interest in this issue, and we have not already contacted you, we'd love to speak with you. Feel free to call us at 979-220-0395 or email us at zrecsmedia [at] gmail [dot] com. Z Recommends aggressively protects confidential and anonymous sources and can provide references in this regard.
Share this post: Delicious | Digg | Facebook | Reddit | Stumble | Email
Categories: food
1. Candace [9/11/09]

Awesome.  Fanned and followed!

2. Anna [9/12/09]

This is great news that you are getting involved.  I’ve tried to buy less canned food lately by making more things from scratch, but it’s just not feasible with canned tomatoes.  I’m really waiting for someone to come thru with a bpa-free can, and you’d think it would be one of the organic companies that would do it first.

3. Emily Weaver Brown [9/13/09]

We buy Eden cans whenever they are available. Just wish that we could get BPA free canned tomatoes. It’s been impossible to eliminate them from our cooking.

4. Bronwyn Ximm [9/13/09]

So glad to know both that this organization exists and that you’re working with them! I’ve pretty much stopped eating canned food since learning about the BPA issue. Another pet peeve in food packaging: restaurants that put hot take-out food in plastic tubs. I try to remember to request paperboard boxes, but being a parent and all, I get distracted and often forget. And then the food comes, and you’re hungry, and what are you gonna do…

5. Jenna [9/23/09]

So glad you’re getting involved and that you told us about this initiative. Coincidentally, I wrote to Swanson a couple of weeks ago to ask them to go BPA-free, too. I loooove their canned chicken and don’t want to stop buying it, but they seem unwilling to go BPA-free at this point. They sent me a coupon. I didn’t want a coupon; I’m not that easily placated. ("Oh! A dollar off! Then who cares about BPA, anyway?")

6. Erika [10/13/09]

Can anyone answer this question:  do ALL cans containing food and beverages use a BPA lining (other than Eden)?  I’m particularly concerned as I drink at least a can of sparkling water a day (La Croix brand--no sodium or calories or additives or anything), and it’s one of my last vices as we’re trying to get pregnant, but I don’t want to keep drinking it if the can lining has BPA in it.  Anyone?

7. Jeremiah [10/13/09]

Erika, I’m afraid the answer is yes. And please note that even Eden Foods’ tomato cans do.

All soft drink cans, to the best of our knowledge, are lined with a BPA-containing epoxy.

All food cans, even though they are steel, are also lined with an epoxy, which also, in every case we know of except Eden Foods’ bean cans, is made with BPA.

I agree that you should stop drinking it, at least while you’re pregnant. The most dramatic effects of BPA are believed to be on in utero exposures. I bet there’s an interesting solution to help you get your sparkling water fix. Anyone?

8. Erika [10/13/09]

Thanks Jeremiah--I appreciate you taking the time to answer this.  I think it might be time to invest in one of those old school seltzer bottles--the kind with the cartridges. Normal screw-top bottles of fizzy water lose their carbonation after the first time they’re opened.

I spent my last pregnancy drinking from both a nalgene bottle, and then a BPA-lined SIGG replacement.  Sigh.  I now have two fantastic new stainless steel double-walled camelback bottles though, courtesy of the wonderful Blue Ridge Mountain Sports chain (a local chain here in VA) that awesomely let me exchange my old SIGGs I bought there a few years ago, though they were beat up and the receipts were long gone.

9. Mominator [10/14/09]

How about one of the brands of sparkling water available in glass? 

I’m curious if the lids used in home canning have BPA on them...will have to do some checking.  (That’s currently my way of somewhat limiting the BPA exposure with canned tomatos...DIY!)

10. Jeremiah [10/14/09]

Mominator: Home canning lids do contain BPA. :(

11. Mominator [10/14/09]

As I suspected (and why I said “limiting” as opposed to “eliminating")...I just cannot bring myself to use the “tulip” style glass lids and rubber gaskets or wax because they just aren’t as safe, food safety wise at least.  Ugh.

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Browse Z Recommends
Looking for something?
The ZRecs Guide
    1360 products, 261 brands, and counting...


Get ZRecs’ monthly newsletter
More good stuff





Advertisements
Advertisements